Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Heard v. Lubbock County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00203
Plaintiff:
Travis James Heard
Defendant:
Joe Brown, Lubbock County Jail and 5 Star Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. DANIEL & MAX LLC d/b/a STANTON OPTICAL
as 3:2020cv00174
Plaintiff:
JAMES HEARD
Defendant:
DANIEL & MAX LLC d/b/a STANTON OPTICAL and DANIEL & MAX, LLC doing business as STANTON OPTICAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heard v. Lubbock County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00152
Plaintiff:
Travis James Heard
Defendant:
Joe Brown, Lubbock County Jail and 5 Star Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22129
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anesha Coleman v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 19-11227
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY WAGENER, JR., Sr. United States Postal Service North Texas P&DC Installation Plant Manager, ALBERT RUIZ, United States Postal Service Spokesperson, GERALDINE FULTON, United States Postal Service North Texas P&DC Supervisor Tour 1 Payroll and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANESHA NICOLAY COLEMAN
Coleman v. United States Postmaster General et al
as 3:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Cindy Greg, Larry Wagener, Jr Sr, Brittany Lindsay and others
Plaintiff:
Anesha Nicolay Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Heard v. Paz et al
as 1:2016cv08475
Plaintiff:
James Heard
Defendant:
Franklin Paz, Antrinius Andrews, Jose Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv08114
Plaintiff:
James Heard
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County DOC, D. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv07825
Plaintiff:
James Heard
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
