Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jamison-Dey v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
James Jamison-Dey
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 til Removal - Truth and Lending
Jamison v. Ziemer
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
James Jamison
Defendant:
David Ziemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 5:2023cv01597
Petitioner:
Willie James Jamison
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Jamison v. Stuart Lippman and Assoc, et al
as 22-3310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee:
STUART LIPPMAN AND ASSOCIATES and ROXANNA JIMENEZ
James Jamison v. Andrew Schumacher, et al
as 21-3622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW SCHUMACHER, Physician's Assistant, JOHN DUNLOP, Clinical Director and JANE BARNES, Health Services Administrator
Jamison v. Stuart Lippman and Associates et al
as 1:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Jamison
Defendant:
Stuart Lippman and Associates and Roxanna Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James Jamison v. B. Harlow
as 20-7711
Defendant / Appellee:
B. HARLOW, RN, R. GROVE, HSA, JOSHUA HALL, RN/Iop/Idc and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JAMISON
Jamison v. Harlow et al
as 5:2020cv00080
Defendant:
B Harlow, Michael Weaver, R. Grove and others
Plaintiff:
James Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jamison v. Schumacher et al
as 4:2020cv00454
Defendant:
Andrew Schumacher, J. Dunlop and Jane Barnes
Plaintiff:
James Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv02421
Defendant:
Andrew Schumacher, Jane Barnes, Dr. J. Dunlop and others
Plaintiff:
James Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
