Cases 1 - 10 of 20
New York Life Insurance Company v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Defendant:
Shirley Johnson, Shirley Holloway, Kathleen Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Johnson v. Washington et al
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick Washington, Ronnie William and Christion Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Johnson, III
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. McClaim et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
M McClaim, Mississippi County Detention Center, Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. White
as 3:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Author White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dean et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Catherine P Dean and John Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lippe v. Stone Bank et al
as 3:2021cv03043
Defendant:
Stone Bank, Marvin Sutterfield, James Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lippe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Ozark Mountain Poultry, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv05075
Defendant:
George's, Inc. and Ozark Mountain Poultry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Laufer et al v. Plant Family Therapeutics, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv03055
Defendant:
Plant Family Therapeutics, LLC, Michael Lunsford and Clint Mickle
Plaintiff:
Erich Laufer, Amy Swann and James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cervantes v. Dobbs et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriff's Office, James Johnson, Joyce Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
