Cases 31 - 40 of 99
JORDAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88235
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Jordan McClain v. Robert Neuschmid
as 8:2020cv00656
Petitioner:
James Jordan McClain
Respondent:
Robert Neuschmid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32670
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JANKOWSKI et al v. ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
as 3:2020cv02458
Plaintiff:
LOIS CHILDS, PAMELA GIBSON, CATHY MASON and others
Defendant:
ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01345
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Howard James Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rickman v. Air Repair, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00546
Defendant:
Todd Rohwer and Air Repair, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie Rickman
Not Yet Classified:
james jordan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JORDAN v. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC et al
as 1:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Wright DiskinsonWright, Michael Vartanian, Jeffrey Craven and others
Plaintiff:
Harry James Jordan and HARRY J. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv00825
Defendant:
Jeffrey Craven and DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
Plaintiff:
ESQ. HARRY JAMES JORDAN and NO PARTY
JORDAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01068
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 4:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and John Doe
Plaintiff:
James Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
