Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAGUSA v. IS3, INC et. al.
as 9:2016cv80786
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAGUSA
Defendant:
IS3, INC, Daniel Scaduto, Carrie Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01252
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RM Techcon Construction, LLC v. First Sealord Surety, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
RM Techcon Construction, LLC
Defendant:
First Sealord Surety, Inc. , Broadlands and James Keating
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buddy Bell v. James Keating, et al
as 11-2408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BUDDY BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES KEATING, Chicago Police Deputy Chief, Star #1367, CARLOS MOTA, Chicago Police Officer, Star #3548, PATRICK MURRAY, Chicago Police Officer, Star #16180 and others
Holston v. Assurant Health et al
as 2:2011cv01596
Plaintiff:
Ronnie N Holston
Defendant:
Assurant Health, Time Insurance Company , Fortis Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KEATING et al v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2010cv06777
Plaintiff:
JAMES KEATING and MARILYN KEATING
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON , BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONS , RONALD COX and others
Cross_claimant:
JONATHAN P. VITRIOL, PSYD , SUSAN BOOZER, LPN , PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
PHYLLIS ANDERSON, RN, MSN, APN-C , SUSAN BOOZER, LPN , CAMILLE BROTHMAN, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thayer v. Keating et al
as 1:2010cv02806
Plaintiff:
Andy Thayer
Defendant:
James Keating, Carlos Mota, Patrick Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAPTISTA et al v. JOHN CRANE, INC.
as 2:2007cv67451
Plaintiff:
GENE BAPTISTA, EVELYN BAPTISTA, WALTER BLOOMINGDALE and others
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
