Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rucker v. Marshall
as 23-60557
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rodney Rucker
Defendant / Appellant:
James Marshall, William Carter and Terreous T.J. Johnson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Hickey et al
as 3:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jerry Johnson
Defendant:
Gregory Hickey, Justin Steelandt and James Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Estate of James Marshall et al v. City of Forest Grove et al
as 3:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Marshall, Sara Marshall and Sara Marshall as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Marshall
Defendant:
City of Forest Grove, Steven Teets, Kole McGann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rucker v. City of Senatobia, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rucker
Defendant:
City of Senatobia, Mississippi, James Marshall, John Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Cissna et al
as 2:2021cv01342
Plaintiff:
Jean Marc Van den Heuvel
Defendant:
Teri Cissna, Ben Alvarez and James Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marshall v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2021cv00694
Defendant:
Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago, John Paladino, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
James Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
