Cases 11 - 20 of 22
In re: James McMillian
as 14-10282
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MCMILLIAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
ALBAYRAK et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05860
Plaintiff:
MIKE ALBAYRAK , TERRY BREWER , PHYLLIS CARTER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMillian v. Newman et al
as 1:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
James McMillian
Defendant:
Mitchell Newman and Marcus Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albayrak et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv03095
Plaintiff:
Mike Albayrak , Terry Brewer , Phyllis Carter and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Albayrak et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03095
Plaintiff:
Mike Albayrak , Terry Brewer , Phyllis Carter and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
WATSON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE WATSON
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WATKINS
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCIVER v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MCIVER
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Chubb v. MDOC, et al
as 09-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. CHUBB
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden, BLAINE LAFLER, Warden, named as "B. Lafler" and others
Garrison #237608 v. Palmer et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Petitioner:
Michael Garrison #237608
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer, Michigan Parole Board, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
