Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Munson v. Shearing et al
as 3:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Robert L. Shearing, Michael Nelson, Dr Trost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Munson v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 14-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, DONALD GAETZ, Warden/Administrative Officer, Menard Correctional Center, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
James Munson v. Donald Gaetz, et al
as 11-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD GAETZ, Warden, LISA SHEMONIC, in charge of publication review and MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections
Munson v. Gaetz et al
as 3:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Shannis Stock, Jeannette Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Old Lyme et al
as 3:2010cv01876
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Anderson , William J. Lacourciere , James Munson and others
Defendant:
Town of Old Lyme, Town of Old Lyme Zoning Commission, Ann C. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munson v. Gaetz et al
as 3:2010cv00881
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, L Shemonic and Michael Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munson v. Kimble et al
as 3:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Michael Kimble, Donald Gaetz and Michael P. Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munson v. Hulick et al
as 3:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Donald Hulick, Donald Gaetz, Roger E Walker, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munson v. Norris
as 5:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munson v. Mourot et al
as 5:2009cv06005
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Jon Mourot, Cleo Smith, Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
