Cases 1 - 10 of 12
READER v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
RICHARD READER
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ABBIE TATE, JAMES ECKARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
OTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32972
Plaintiff:
JAMES OTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18441
Plaintiff:
JAMES OTT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ott v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv02062
Plaintiff:
James Ott
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ott v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00601
Plaintiff:
James Ott
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ott v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services et al
as 1:2016cv01374
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services , Hewlett Packard Company Disability Plan and Hewlett Packard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Ott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 13-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, JAN E. KEARNEY and others
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 12-16840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, SCOTT MACMILLAN BAKER and others
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 12-15223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, SCOTT MACMILLAN BAKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
