Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Anderson v. Runge, et al.
as 23-1535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES P. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN RUNGE, L. RICHARDSON and D. ARVIZO
James P. Anderson v. Marcus Pollard
as 2:2021cv04875
Respondent:
Marcus Pollard
Petitioner:
James P. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Newton County, GA et al
as 1:2021cv02049
Plaintiff:
Michel Thomas
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Newton County, GA, Deputy Lachrenmayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Runge et al
as 3:2021cv00922
Defendant:
Kevin Runge, L. Richardson and D. Arvizo
Plaintiff:
James P. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00436
Plaintiff:
James P Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ANDERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv43816
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ANDERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ANDERSON et al V. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61302
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ANDERSON and LYDIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Williams
as 5:2010cv05392
Plaintiff:
James P. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv72914
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ANDERSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv72915
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ANDERSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
