Cases 11 - 20 of 86
United States v. Scott Wells
as 21-3411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Wells, also known as Scott James Wells
WELLS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv06280
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv02856
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
JAMES WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Helgeson v. Stoner et al
as 0:2020cv62346
Defendant:
Officer Ervins Hyppolite, Judge Susan Alspector, Officer Thomas Bickman and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Quinn Helgeson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Robinson et al
as 5:2020cv01306
Defendant:
Robert Robinson, James and Dana Wells, Dana Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rondon et al v. Mendocino County et al
as 4:2020cv07013
Plaintiff:
Skunkworx, LLC and Andres Rondon
Defendant:
Darren Brewster, Mendocino County, Matthew Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65072
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37761
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12968
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
