Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Paden et al v. Wagner et al
as 3:2016cv02565
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Paden, Sandford Williams, Jr. and James Williams
Defendant:
James Wagner, Austin Anglemyer, Catherine T. Pirolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mahally et al
as 1:2016cv02512
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Mahally and Robin Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07014
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT et al
as 2:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT, PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv06188
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. MEALY
as 2:2015cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MEALY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Graff et al
as 1:2014cv01879
Plaintiff:
James William Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel H. Graff, David M. Whitcomb, Mark A. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
