Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sims v. Bird et al
as 3:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Nelson Clark Sims
Defendant:
L. Bird, K. Willey, M. Carillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Clayton v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv06015
Plaintiff:
James Edward Clayton and Okie Redpaw
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Casey Kaech, Lara Stick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. McCaleb et al
as 3:2022cv02422
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jordan
Defendant:
John McCaleb, Susan Kirk, Marc Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. McCaleb et al
as 3:2022cv03206
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jordan
Defendant:
John McCaleb, Susan Kirk, Marc Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brechel v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv04541
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brechel
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Jan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dallas, Laponzo v. Clerk of Eastern District et al
as 3:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Laponzo Monroe Dallas
Defendant:
Clerk of Eastern District, Jan or John Does, Lynn Adelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dallas, Laponzo v. Horton, Karen et al
as 3:2017cv00870
Plaintiff:
Laponzo Monroe Dallas
Defendant:
Karen Horton, Brandon Decker, Jan and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05032
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jones
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jan or John Doe, Western Illinois Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
