Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shannon Riley v. Sheriff Luna et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Defendant:
Sheriff Luna, John Jane Doe Deputy Sheriff and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Junious v. W. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv03681
Plaintiff:
Angelica Lavern Junious and Angelica Junious
Defendant:
SGT. W. BAKER #3159, R/O C. CHENGARY #16269, R/LT PURCELL #758 and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morton, Floyd v. John/Jane Doe Deputy Sheriff
as 3:2020cv01081
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Deputy Sheriff
Plaintiff:
Floyd J. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Sweitzer v. John Doe 1
as 20-1984
Defendant:
DARIO J. BROCCOLINO, Esq., State's Attorney, Howard County, JANET C. MOSS, Executive Director, MICHELE D. HOTTEN, Hon. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, M. D., CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER and JOHN DOE 2, M. D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP J. SWEITZER
Sweitzer v. McGuinn et al
as 1:2017cv01741
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Sweitzer
Defendant:
Colleen McGuinn, Dario J. Broccolino, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Goodman v. Kenneth Stolle
as 14-6278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GRAHAM GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH W. STOLLE, Sheriff/High Constable, JOHN DOE, Sergeant/Sheriffs Deputy, JOHN DOE, Corporal/Sheriffs Deputy and others
David Goodman v. Kenneth Stolle
as 13-7523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GRAHAM GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH W. STOLLE, Sheriff/High Constable, JOHN DOE, Sergeant/Sheriffs Deputy, JOHN DOE, Corporal/Sheriffs Deputy and others
Chasse et al v. Humphreys et al
as 3:2007cv00189
Plaintiff:
James P Chasse, Jr, James P Chasse, Jr, James P Chasse, Jr and others
Defendant:
Christopher Humphreys, Christopher Humphreys, Kyle Nice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
