Cases 61 - 70 of 143
Terrill v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrill
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Crawford Larry, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2019cv01896
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. Robertson Jr. et al
as 4:2019cv00378
Defendant:
Timothy Lee Chambers, XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seaton v. Munsterman et al
as 4:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and Scott Munsterman
Plaintiff:
Richard A Seaton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Hays et al
as 4:2018cv02072
Defendant:
cody bennett, Stanley Payne, Troy Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Rodriquez Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxfield v. City of Kansas City et al
as 4:2018cv00896
Defendant:
Unknown Open Facility, Jane Doe 1, Unknown Building and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. Center for Behavioral Medicine et al
as 4:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Jeanette Simmons, Jane Doe 1, Center for Behavioral Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Teresita Linares and Daniel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00731
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Oyer v. Turner et al
as 4:2018cv00691
Defendant:
Frank White, John Doe Nursing Company, Doug McMillan and others
Plaintiff:
John Oyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auman v. McMillan et al
as 4:2018cv00636
Defendant:
Shockey Franciscus, Doug McMillan, John Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Auman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
