Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mark Stuart, et al v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 21-15504
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SMITH, Husband, VIRGINIA KORTE, Wife, SANTAELLA, Wife, named as Jane Doe Santaella and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK STUART, an Individual and Chairman, DBA Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale, DBA Save Our Preserve, Inc.
Plaintiff:
SAVE OUR PRESERVE, INC., an Arizona corporation on behalf of its members and MARGARET STUART, an Individual and Treasurer, DBA Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale
Roman-Alvarado v. City of Lakewood et al
as 3:2011cv05749
Defendant:
City of Lakewood , Matthew H Brown , Jane Doe Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jose E Roman-Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Theodore D Harris
Defendant:
Kootenai County , Rocky Watson , Jane Doe Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gino Jackson v. Eric Olsen
as 10-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINO V. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. OLSEN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, DANIEL M. CHICHESTER, Stafford Commonwealth Attorney, sued under the principal of respondeat superior, PHONG MICHAEL HARDIMAN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law and others
Defendant:
DAVID P. BAUGH, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, JOSEPH T. BROWN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, KRISTIE L. KANE, sued in her individual capacities that is under color of law and others
Waterman v. Hall et al
as 2:2009cv01676
Plaintiff:
Ron Waterman
Defendant:
Randall Hall, Jane Doe Hall and Northwest Defenders Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Wilson et al
as 4:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Randy G. Spencer
Defendant:
Judy Wilson, Michael Wilson, Jay A. Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
