Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harris v. City of Centralia et al
as 3:2022cv05129
Plaintiff:
Peter Harris
Defendant:
Centralia City of, Phillip Reynolds, John Dorff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Dixon v. Frank Bishop
as 21-6512
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY BEAN, FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden NBCI, R. S. RODERICK, CMM & Acting Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM K. DIXON
GIBSON v. HARRY et al
as 2:2019cv01647
Defendant:
B. COWFER, "JANE DOE" FAITH, J. JACSON and others
Plaintiff:
TYREESE GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Lt. George Malpine, Jason L. Harbaugh, Lt. Jack Johns and others
Plaintiff:
William K. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Bishop et al
as 8:2018cv02883
Defendant:
RS. Roderick, Jason L. Harbaugh, Jane Doe Miller and others
Plaintiff:
William K. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Taylor et al v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
Brenda Taylor , Sarah Settles and Joyce Taylor
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Michael Spaulding, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2017cv05107
Plaintiff:
Bruce Jordan
Defendant:
Robert Miller , Swift Transportation Company , Swift Transportation Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Miller et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Bruce Jordan
Defendant:
Robert Miller , Swift Transportation Company , Swift Transportation Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
