Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hicks v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv20246
Plaintiff:
Hicks Janet and Janet Hicks
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
White et al v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 3:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Daniel White, Lynette Adkins, Mary Burgess and others
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McKenzie v. Artists Rights Society, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Michael McKenzie individually doing business as American Image Art, an unincorporated dba
Defendant:
Artists Rights Society, Inc. and Janet Hicks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hicks v. Isabella Visiting Care, Inc.
as 1:2018cv06485
Plaintiff:
Janet Hicks
Defendant:
Isabella Visiting Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hicks v. Isabella Visiting Care, Inc.
as 1:2018cv06603
Plaintiff:
Janet Hicks
Defendant:
Isabella Visiting Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl
Hicks v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv29577
Plaintiff:
Janet Hicks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy McDaniel v. Warden, et al
as 13-11317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, JANET HICKS, Captain and LEONARDO MOORE, Officer
Bernard Jemison v. Warden, et al
as 12-15161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD JEMISON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, JANET HICKS, Captain and MARK LOMAN, Lieutenant
McDaniel v. Barrett et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00745
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne McDaniel
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett, Janet Hicks and Leonardo Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemison v. Barrett et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00727
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett, Janet Hicks and Mark Loman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
