Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pryce v. Schuylkill County Prison
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jason John Pryce
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selness v. Mohave County Jail
as 3:2022cv08060
Plaintiff:
Jason John Selness
Defendant:
Mohave County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selness v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2022cv08034
Plaintiff:
Jason John Selness
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Wade, Unknown Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feeney v. Davenport Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Edward Steven Feeney, Jr
Defendant:
Davenport Police Department, John Marlin Hutcheson, Jr, Bryan Christopher Butt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Rathman
as 2:2012cv03580
Petitioner:
Jason John Ramirez
Respondent:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nguyen Vu, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-2285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NGUYEN VU and THANH THI NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JASON JOHN KEGEL, COREY ANTHONY MATTES and others
Johns v. Coosa County Jail (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Johns
Defendant:
Coosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen Vu v. City of Philadelphia
as 10-4331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NGUYEN VU and THANH THI NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JASON JOHN KEGEL, COREY ANTHONY MATTES and others
McLaughlin v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv01142
Petitioner:
Jason John McLaughlin
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VU v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
NGUYEN VU
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JASON JOHN KEGEL, COREY ANTHONY MATTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
