Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Smith v. United States Penitentiary Lee
as 7:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Smith
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. United States of America
as 9:2011cv80517
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. United States Penitentiary Lee (Lee USP)
as 7:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Smith
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Lee (Lee USP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jason Smith v. FBI
as 10-7702
Petitioner - Appellant:
JASON JOSEPH SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 7:2010cv00454
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Petitioner:
Jason Joseph Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Touchet et al v. Codman & Shurtleff Inc et al
as 6:2010cv00630
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Touchet , Dudley Joseph Touchet , Jason Joseph Touchet and others
Defendant:
Codman & Shurtleff Inc and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2009cv00559
Petitioner:
Jason Joseph Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Slavicek v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 0:2009cv02432
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Slavicek and Jason Joseph Slavicek
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Easley v. Bauer et al
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
William Bauer, Jason Joseph, SOCF Mail Room Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
