Cases 31 - 40 of 55
AGUIAR v. RECKTENWALD et al
as 3:2013cv02616
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aguiar
Defendant:
M. Recktenwald , Jeff Butler , C. Bergen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AGUIAR v. RECKTENWALD et al
as 1:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN AGUIAR
Defendant:
M. RECKTENWALD, JEFF BUTLER, C. BERGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walter Brown v. Monica Recktenwald, et al
as 13-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MONICA RECKTENWALD and ACTING WARDEN JEFF BUTLER
Praizner, et al v. Finch, et al
as 3:2012cv02920
Plaintiff:
Matthew Praizner , Stacey Praizner , Joseph Amador and others
Defendant:
Christopher Finch , Jonathan Finch, Brian Finch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Peter Bernegger v. Sarah Adams, et al
as 12-60629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER BERNEGGER
Defendant - Appellee:
MACK GRIMMETT, TOMMY TAYLOR, SCOTT PETERSON and others
Brown v. Recktenwald et al
as 1:2012cv01135
Petitioner:
Walter Brown
Respondent:
Warden Monica Recktenwald and Acting Warden Jeff Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riggs v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv01122
Plaintiff:
David Glynn Riggs
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Joe Easterling , Jeremy Sweat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimbrough v. Butler et al
as 3:2012cv00831
Petitioner:
John Kimbrough
Respondent:
Jeff Butler and Monica Rectenwald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Koorsen, Jr. v. Jeff Butler, et al
as 11-3156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. KOORSEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF BUTLER, Administrator and BETTY GOINS, Nurse - 420B
Mills v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2011cv01281
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Joe Easterling, Rosie Kendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
