Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council and Kinetik Justice
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, John Hamm, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Celestine George
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jefferson Dunn and Ruth Naglich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Clara Watson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Edward Ellington, Cynthia McCovery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dwayne Aaron
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Joseph Headley, Correctional Officer Guise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Randolph et al
as 2:2021cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ryon Russell
Defendant:
Sergeant Randolph, Correctional Officer Williams, Correctional Officer Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hamilton
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kim Thomas, Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpers v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Bumpers
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2020cv01026
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Smith, III
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc
Saunders v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2020cv00456
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John G. Smith, Steven Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00385
Defendant:
Ruth Naglich, Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Maya Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
