Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LYTLE v. HARDY
as 2:2019cv01552
Plaintiff:
ROLAND LYTLE
Defendant:
JEFFERY HARDY, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ekryss v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 16-3408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jhared Ekryss, Connie Jean Juergens, Stephen Seigal and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond A. Blanchette, III, Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., Kevin Cottingim and others
Ekryss et al v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv06742
Plaintiff:
Jhared Ekryss, Connie Jean Juergens, Stephen Seigal and others
Defendant:
Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., Raymond A. Blanchette, III, Kevin Cottingim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hardie v. Baccaldia et al
as 2:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hardie
Defendant:
Claudia Baccaldia and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardie v. Balducci et al
as 2:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hardie
Defendant:
Claudia Balducci and King County Jail On Duty Correction Officers 2nd Shift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
E.N.N., et al v. City of Selma, et al
as 11-13605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E.N.N. and LOUIS DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY HARDY, CITY OF SELMA, RAY BLANKS and others
Felicia Dixon v. City of Selma, Alabama, et al
as 11-10183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELICIA OWENS DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SELMA, ALABAMA, JEFFERY HARDY, BEAUTY BENJAMIN and others
Hopkins v. City of Selma et al
as 2:2010cv00523
Plaintiff:
William Hopkins
Defendant:
City of Selma , Jeffery Hardy , Ray Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon et al v. City of Selma et al
as 2:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
E. N. N. and Louis Dixon
Defendant:
City of Selma , Jeffery Hardy , Ray Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. City of Selma et al
as 2:2009cv00684
Plaintiff:
Felicia Owens Dixon
Defendant:
City of Selma, Jeffery Hardy, Beauty Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
