Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SCHULTZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05850
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCHULTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAYTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
ALANA PAYTON, COLE M. RADICIC, MATTHEW WHELIHAN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC v. S&J Auto1 LCC et al
as 1:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC
Defendant:
S&J Auto1 LLC, S&J Auto2 LLC, S&J Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHULTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03001
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv06079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Schultz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05016
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schultz and Jeffrey Darren Schultz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schultz v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03140
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Credit Adjusters, LLC v. Cred X Debt Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
National Credit Adjusters, LLC
Defendant:
Cred X Debt Recovery, LLC, James Sauer, Jeffrey Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19731
Plaintiff:
Dorothy R. Schultz and Jeffrey Schultz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
