Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Moats v. Natl Crdt Un Admin Bd
as 24-40259
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Moats
Defendant:
National Credit Union Administration Board, A Federal Administrative Agency, Todd M. Harper, In their official capacity as Members of the National Credit Union Administration Board, Kyle S. Hauptman, In their official capacity as Members of the National Credit Union Administration Board and others
Moats v. National Credit Union Administration Board et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Moats
Defendant:
National Credit Union Administration Board, Todd M. Harper, Kyle S. Hauptman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponte v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
John C. Ponte
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman Travis Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ponte v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
John C. Ponte
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Travis Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bonan v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Frank William Bonan II
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Martin J Gruenberg, Michael J Hsu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Burgess v. Whang
as 22-11172
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cornelius Campbell Burgess
Defendant / Appellant:
Jennifer Whang, In her official capacity as an Administrative Law Judge, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Martin J. Gruenberg, In his official capacity as Acting Chairman of the FDIC and others
Burgess v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 7:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Campbell Burgess
Defendant:
Judge Jennifer Whang, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Martin J. Gruenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
