Cases 1 - 10 of 19
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21210
Plaintiff:
JERRY ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
JERRY ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Keon Williams
Defendant:
Jerry Rogers, Pershing County Sheriff and Pershing County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Smith
as 22-30352
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jerry Rogers, Jr.
Defendant / Appellant:
Randy Smith, Sheriff, Danny Culpeper and Keith Canizaro
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07245
Plaintiff:
JERRY ROGERS, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morton v. City of Corinth, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Clovis Daniel Morton
Defendant:
City of Corinth, Mississippi, City of Corinth Police Department, Ralph Dance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOFORTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45396
Plaintiff:
JERRY ROGER GOFORTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84472
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Smith et al
as 2:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Danny Culpeper and Keith Canizaro
Plaintiff:
Jerry Rogers and Jerry Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Staggs et al
as 2:2017cv02115
Plaintiff:
Jerry Rogers
Defendant:
Justin Staggs and Cindy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
