Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DAY-HARRIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRIS and QUINCY DAY-HARRIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Asher et al v. Clay County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Education, CCBOE, Mark Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher, Shawn Smith, Carol Jean Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Balaty et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00742
Plaintiff:
Robert Balaty, Gloria Bowman, Mark Brandow and others
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
SLR, Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Ortec, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Balaty et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00358
Plaintiff:
Robert Balaty , Gloria Bowman , Julie Brozovich and others
Defendant:
Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , SLR, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
IN RE Stand 'N Seal, Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01804
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Dempsey, James Dieringer, Patricia Kayser and others
Defendant:
Color Caulk Inc., Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Ortec, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
SLR, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cable News Network, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Easy Care Products and Tile Perfect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
