Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Butler v. Tidwell et al
as 6:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Terry Spangler, Ronald Wesley Tidwell, Zachery A Ressler and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Tidwell et al
as 4:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Terry Spangler, Ronald Wesley Tidwell, Zachery A Ressler and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearer v. Miller et al
as 0:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Jill Miller and Dr. Frederick Kemen, MD
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Shearer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Litteral
as 0:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Leonel Martinez
Defendant:
Kathy Litteral, Jill Miller, Carla Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Litteral
as 5:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Leonel Martinez
Defendant:
Kathy Litteral, Jill Miller, Carla Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. McGowan, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, FNU Dietz, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmore v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv01101
Plaintiff:
Nathaneal Joel Elmore
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Correctional Corporations of America, Hardeman County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jill Miller v. Johnnie Jone
as 13-30547
Petitioner - Appellant:
JILL MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNIE JONES, Warden, Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women
Jill Miller v. Johnnie Jone
as 13-30232
Petitioner - Appellant:
JILL MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNIE JONES, Warden, Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women
Miller v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv01234
Plaintiff:
Jill Miller and Jill Miller
Defendant:
Johnnie Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
