Cases 31 - 40 of 75
(HC) Mabon v. Cooper
as 2:2023cv01004
Petitioner:
Lejon Mabon
Respondent:
Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jones v. Cooper
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Philip John Jones
Defendant:
Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Latifi v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Kareem Latifi
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, Sacramento County and R.C.C.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Singh v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Defendant:
Jim Cooper and Aaron Leahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 23-4042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOY ARLAN BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, PETE AGUILAR, COLIN Z. ALLRED and others
(PC) Kern v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
James Kern
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, A. Leahy, Tamira Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Fickenworth v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Garrison Fickenworth
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, JPS Coordinator and JPS Phychiatrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim Rogers v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 22-16997
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff, GUADALUPE SANCHEZ, Manager, California sex offender registry and others
Ayers et al v. Hargett et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Betty Jane Ayers, David Russell Ayers and Sarah Walker Bruun
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Stephens, Gen. Jonathan Skrmetti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pleasant-Bey v. United States Congress et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Boaz Pleasant-Bey and The
Defendant:
United States Congress, The Principal Instrument of the United States, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
