Cases 31 - 40 of 229
Garcia v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv01004
Plaintiff:
Victor Martinez Garcia
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv00952
Plaintiff:
Amante Gary Evans
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel Mansanares v. Joe Arpaio
as 10-15897
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL MANSANARES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff
Rawls v. Maricopa County, et al
as 2:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Vernon Rawls
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Joe Arpaio , Unknown Murillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arthur Coleman v. Sheriff Joe Arpaio et al
as 8:2010cv00108
Respondent:
Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Attorney General of the state of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Coleman
Coleman v. Arpaio et al
as 3:2010cv00101
Petitioner:
Arthur Coleman
Respondent:
Joe Arpaio, Orange County Public Defenders Office and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damian Dudley v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 09-17623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIAN L. DUDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff of Maricopa County, ANDREW THOMAS, County Attorney and others
Hassan v. Maricopa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2009cv02219
Plaintiff:
Said Ali Hassan
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Joe Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James O'Hines v. Ford, et al
as 09-17232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LYNN O'HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD, CO III, HOLMS, CO II, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff and others
Grady v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01996
Plaintiff:
Anthony Aaron Grady
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, Don Stapley, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
