Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Swan v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00130
Defendant:
John Walker, Brandon Sutton, Joe Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis A Swan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Carl B Ellis, III
Defendant:
John Walker, Brandon Sutton, Joe Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00087
Plaintiff:
Stanley Wilkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Jon Walker, Cross County Detention Center and Joe Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Cross County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00222
Plaintiff:
Stanley Wilkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Jon Walker, Cross County Detention Center and Joe Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Rickie Joe Kelly
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kelly v. Schrumpf et al
as 1:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Rickie Joe Kelly
Defendant:
Jason Schrumpf, Karen Bryant and Lee Chesnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicklas, et al v. Kelly, et al
as 4:2017cv03131
Defendant:
John Does (1-50), Joe Kelly and Lancaster County Attorney
Plaintiff:
Michelle Nicklas, Jane Roes (1-50) and John Roes (1-50)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mumin v. Kelly et al
as 8:2017cv00099
Defendant:
Jeffre Cheuvront, Joe Kelly, Lancaster County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumin v. Frakes et al
as 4:2017cv03032
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epp et al v. Frakes et al
as 4:2016cv03176
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
William Epp and Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
