Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Rodriguez et al v. Miller et al
as 5:2026cv04016
Plaintiff:
Jesus Alejandro Rodriguez and Peyton Heins
Defendant:
Joe Miller and Joshua Miller
Counter-Claimant:
Joshua Miller and Joe Miller
Counter-Defendant:
Peyton Heins and Jesus Alejandro Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
MILLER et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00009
Petitioner:
JOE MILLER and JASZMIN MILLER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Davis v. Joe Miller, Inc., et al
as 24-1700
Defendant:
JOE MILLER, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., KIM MILLER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GORDON JON DAVIS
Davis v Joe Miller, Inc., et al
as 4:2023cv40098
Defendant:
Joe Miller, Inc., Miller Fence Company, Inc., Joe Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Jon Davis
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
(PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail
as 2:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Miller
Defendant:
Amador County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail
as 2:2021cv02226
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Miller
Defendant:
Amador County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail
as 2:2021cv02132
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Miller
Defendant:
Amador County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nice et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nice and Metro ACC LLC
Defendant:
City of Akron, Daniel Horrigan, Kenneth Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Abdul Mohammed v. Prairie State Legal Services,, et al
as 21-1076
Defendant / Appellee:
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES, INC., TIMOTHY MCJOYNT, ISLAMIC CENTER OF NAPERVILLE INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL AZEEM MOHAMMED
Mohammed v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv03482
Defendant:
Kimberly Verest, Daniel Guerin, Paul Leong and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
