Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Patterson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2018cv03100
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Perry Joe Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry Patterson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10045
Petitioner - Appellant:
PERRY JOE PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Patterson v. California Correctional Health Services
as 2:2016cv01538
Plaintiff:
Joe Patterson
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Services and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry Patterson v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10477
Petitioner - Appellant:
PERRY JOE PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Patterson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv00322
Petitioner:
Perry Joe Patterson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Montague v. Corrections Corporation of Ame, et al
as 11-6291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MONTAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, CHERRY LINDAMOOD, DANIEL PRITCHARD and others
Reggie Patterson v. Larry Norri
as 10-2364
Petitioner - Appellant:
Reggie Joe Patterson
Respondent - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Montague v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood, Daniel Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Arkansas, State of
as 5:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Reggie Joe Patterson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rubio v. McElroy et al
as 1:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rubio
Defendant:
Phillip McElroy, Joshua Chavera, Joe Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
