Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Bias v. Crosby et al
as 2:2008cv01819
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Bias
Defendant:
Chante Bias Crosby, Mike Hale, David Barber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts v. Hall
as 2:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joe Roberts and Joe Roberts
Defendant:
Beverly R Hall
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 6.98 Acres in Smith County et al
as 3:2008cv00335
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant:
6.98 Acres in Smith County, 2.63 Acres in Smith County, Sue Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBERTS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE ROBERTS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBERTS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2008cv00178
Petitioner:
BOBBY JOE ROBERTS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBERTS v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2008cv00172
Petitioner:
BOBBY JOE ROBERTS
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBERTS v. SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2008cv00441
Petitioner:
BOBBY JOE ROBERTS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patron v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00060
Petitioner:
Joe Robert Patron
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIZELLE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
as 2:2007cv73785
Plaintiff:
HENRY A MIZELLE and JOE ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Katz v. Mogus et al
as 1:2007cv08314
Plaintiff:
Howard Katz
Defendant:
Joe Robert Mogus and All That Glitters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
