Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Combat Zone Corp. v. Does 1-2
as 7:2012cv00322
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Combat Zone Corp. v. Does 1-2
as 2:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp.
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Combat Zone Corp. v. John/Jane Does 1-2
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp.
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sood v. Rampersaud et al
as 7:2012cv05486
Plaintiff:
Loveleen Sood
Defendant:
Rejendra Rampersaud and John/Jane Does 1&2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02808
Plaintiff:
Kenroy Raphael John
Defendant:
The City of New York, John/Jane Doe # 1, John/Jane Doe # 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02688
Plaintiff:
Edwin Austin
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Correction, Dora Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Remy v. NYS Dept of Taxation
as 11-1921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lesly Remy
Defendant:
Commissioners, Directors, Chiefs and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, New York State Office Children and Family Services and others
Radcliffe v. Robinson et al
as 2:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Radcliffe
Defendant:
Monte Robinson, Jeff Happ, City of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELEO v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2010cv00735
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DELEO
Defendant:
JON A. THOMAS, ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE and JOHN/JANE DOE 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
