Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 3:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McConnell
as 1:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
John Bender Davis, Jr
Defendant:
McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Davis v. Eric Wilson
as 18-6131
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN GUY DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC WILSON, Warden
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 1:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & FIREARMS et al
as 1:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. DAVIS
Defendant:
ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & FIREARMS and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Edwards, Unknown Down and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Davis v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 18-15047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LEO DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, Jail Commander, Sheriff at Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Former Jail Commander, Sheriff at Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, S. VAIL, Jail Commander, Captain at Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (A2985) and others
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv04479
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Major-Davis v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-11383
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL JOHN MAJOR-DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
