Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pugh et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03313
Plaintiff:
Jean White, Richard Dominguez, Janette Robinson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Accord Healthcare, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pugh et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00923
Plaintiff:
Savannah Pugh , Delma Acosta-Dominguez , Richard Dominguez and others
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Hospira, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc. et al
as ILN/1:18-cv-00923
Plaintiff:
Savannah Pugh , Delma Acosta-Dominguez , Richard Dominguez and others
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Hospira, Inc. and others
Burnham v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Burnham
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21557
Plaintiff:
Donna Maria Burnham and John Burnham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00412
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Eberle v. The Town of Lynnfield et al
as 1:2011cv10620
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Eberle
Defendant:
The Town of Lynnfield, John Burnham, Brian Materazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burlington Insurance Company, The v. BB&T Insurance Services of California, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00315
Plaintiff:
Burlington Insurance Company, The and Burlington Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
BB&T Insurance Services of California, Inc., BB&T-John Burnham Insurance Services, Masoud Shahri and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
