Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Burrow v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2019cv00520
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
John Burrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Kirisits et al
as 6:2016cv06375
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Freeman
Defendant:
Christopher Kirisits, Phil Griffin, Colomba Misseritti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrows et al v. Neomedic International, S.L. et al
as 2:2015cv13433
Plaintiff:
Courtney A. Burrows and John Burrows
Defendant:
Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic Inc. , Specialities Remeex International, S.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burrow, Jr. v. Bank of the West Insurance Agency
as 6:2009cv06103
Plaintiff:
John Burrow, Jr.
Defendant:
Bank of the West Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Burrow, Jr. v. Bank of the West Insurance Agency
as 3:2009cv06103
Plaintiff:
John Burrow, Jr.
Defendant:
Bank of the West Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Michael Burrows v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73883
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN BURROWS, I, pro se
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
John Burrows v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69499
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co
Plaintiff:
John Burrows
BURROWS v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69499
Plaintiff:
JOHN BURROWS
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
