Cases 1 - 10 of 4,429
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentine-Williams v. City of Omaha, Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
LaWanda J. Valentine-Williams
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Priester-King v. Bhatti et al
as 1:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Daquan Priester-King
Defendant:
Aaqib Bhatti, Steven Carballo, Mubbashar Zahid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
