Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00804
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Entzel et al
as 3:2019cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jamar Holt
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Fred Entzel, Eric Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kuhbander v. John Doe #1 et al
as 3:2019cv00167
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Kuhbander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Jividen et al
as 2:2018cv01350
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Paws 4 People, Ralph Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Rickard et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gary Warren Hancock, Jr.
Defendant:
Barbara Rickard, Sawyers, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Short v. Benion et al
as 2:2014cv16506
Plaintiff:
Harvey Patrick Short
Defendant:
Benion , Terry , Jim Rubenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lively v. Ballard et al
as 2:2013cv28759
Plaintiff:
Charles Lively
Defendant:
David Ballard, James Rubenstein, James McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chafin v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2013cv01706
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Mike Clark , Director of West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Officer Mathew Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Warden of Mount Olive Correctional Complex, et al.
as 2:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Louis Thomas
Defendant:
Warden of Mount Olive Correctional Complex, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
