Cases 41 - 50 of 107
McClure v. Collier et al
as 5:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Jennifer Tharp, Jessi Valdez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel v. General Motors Co. et al
as 7:2019cv00111
Defendant:
General Motors Co., John Doe-5, John Doe-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Kriset Rangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lines v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00893
Respondent:
John Doe, 3, Tenet Concepts, LLC, Amazon.Com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lines
Robertson v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Unknown Nagel, Norris Hogans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Warden John Doe 4 et al
as 4:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Leon Thomas Burnett
Defendant:
Warden John Doe 4, John Doe 1 White, John Doe 2 Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed Omran v. Robert Wyche, et al
as 18-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN AB OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WYCHE, STEVE PRATOR, ARDISE HICKS and others
Johnson v. Cazes et al
as 3:2017cv01752
Defendant:
Acadian Ambulance Services, Inc., Esdron Brown, Mike Cazes and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cole v. Max Mahan Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cole
Defendant:
John Doe 1 through John Doe 5, John Doe 6 through John Doe 10 and Max Mahan Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kharb, Praveen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kharb
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Taylor County et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ken David Scott
Defendant:
Taylor County, TX, Ricky Bishop, Taylor County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
