Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hilts v. Cannon Equipment Company, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00877
Defendant:
John Doe No. 1, John Does Nos. 2-10 and Cannon Equipment Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jacob Hilts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FORMAN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv05300
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 1, CORRECTIONS OFFICER YOCUM, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK FORMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE BITCONNECT SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 9:2018cv80086
Plaintiff:
Charles Wildes, Ronald Nelson, Akiva Katz and others
Defendant:
BitConnect Trading Ltd., Ryan Hildreth, Trevon Brown and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Baltazar Avalos, Charles Mabra, Paul Long and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Bitconnect and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Lopez v. WalMart Stores East, LP. et al
as 1:2016cv02175
Plaintiff:
Maria Lopez
Defendant:
WalMart Stores East, LP. , John Does Nos 1 and John Does Nos 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAILEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv01835
Plaintiff:
JOHN BAILEY, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL, GERALDINE COHEN, JOHN DOE NO 1 SERGEANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELGADILLO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
JOE DELGADILLO
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections , State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill , John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELGADILLO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2015cv06562
Plaintiff:
JOE DELGADILLO
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT CAMP HILL , JOHN DOE NO. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
