Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gibson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, John Doe, "John Doe" Kerpieck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferebee v. Manis et al
as 7:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee and Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl A. Manis, Malvin Davis, C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devin Andrich v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 19-16826
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE COONS, CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE ELLIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Devin Andrich v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 19-15598
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE COONS, CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE ELLIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
WILLIAMS v. INDIANA DEPT. CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00204
Defendant:
JERRY ANDERSON, SGT. BLACKMAN, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
KERRY L. WILLIAMS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-16990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADOC, CHRIS MENDOZA, Deputy Warden at ASPC, MICHAEL ADU-TUTU, Deputy Director (ADOC) Inmate Health Services and others
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-16253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADOC, MENDOZA, named as John Doe Mendoza, Deputy Warden, ADU-TUTU, Deputy Director (ADOC) Inmate Health Services and others
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Robert White, et al
as 11-16091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. WHITE, M.D., ADOC Physician, UNKNOWN ROBERTS, named as John Doe Roberts, ADOC Physician and GALE STEINHAUSER, ADOC, Physician
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
