Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Burks v. Stickney et al
as 9:2016cv00759
Plaintiff:
Mattieu Burks
Defendant:
Chad Stickney, Nolan, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
Don Alan McLaughlin
Defendant:
Michelle Ortiz , Paul R D'Agostino , Charles A. Mineo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Overbaugh et al
as 9:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Michael Overbaugh, Raymond Catina, Vincent Cuda, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HEATH v. DOGUN et al
as 1:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HEATH
Defendant:
EYETA JOHN DOGUN, NANCY A. GIROUX, ULLIE KLEMM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners John Does 1-25 et al
as 1:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners John Does 1-25, Robert Tobik, Jesse Canonico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Brooklyn Metropolitan Detentio
as 13-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Espinoza
Defendant:
Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center and Cornell Companies/Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
Defendant - Appellee:
Zenk, Warden, Lamadue, Unit Manager, Francisco, Case Manager and others
Brown v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02082
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, Sgt. Goods and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Swinson v. Harold et al
as 1:2012cv05577
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Defendant:
Robert W. Harold, Esq., John Doe (1-25) and John Doe (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
