Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Gonzalez v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00186
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Shawn R. Gillis, John Does 1-7 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv04965
Defendant:
Sergeant Campos, Cermak Directors, Officers Jane, & John Doe's 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Ogle County et al
as 3:2020cv50063
Defendant:
William White, Ogle County, Female Deputies Jane Doe 1-8 and others
Plaintiff:
William Wayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennemer v. Parker County et al
as 4:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Tom Spurlock, FNU Coffee, Larry Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. U City PD et al
as 4:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Johnson
Defendant:
U City PD and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Reviere et al
as 1:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Robert Williams, Officer Antonio Norman, John Does 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2019cv21391
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES, JOHN DOES 1-7 and RONALD P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05320
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Manhattan Detention Center, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corwell v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv03049
Plaintiff:
Ziare Corwell
Defendant:
LaFonda Spaulding, John Does 1-7 and Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Reed et al
as 6:2018cv06114
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Defendant:
John Does, 2-4, Larry Reed, Co. Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
