Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robert Gamez, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 20-16180
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as: United States, MARQUIS SOFTWARE, formerly referred to as Doe 11, GARCIA, First Name Unknown; CO III and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STACY CRABTREE, central office classification ofc, WILLETT, First Name Unknown; Correctional Officer, Arizona Department of Corrections, RASTOGI, First Name Unknown; psychiatrist at Ariz. Dept. of Corr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CARRASCO GAMEZ, Jr.
Goings v. Does 4-7 et al
as 3:2020cv00568
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and John Does 4-7
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Goings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv03045
Defendant:
New York Court Officer John Doe 1, City of New York, New York Court Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Williams
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2019cv01412
Plaintiff:
Debra V. Wade
Defendant:
Jairo Diaz, Cynthia Mack-Pierce, John Does 4-7 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. D'Agata et, al
as 7:2016cv00044
Defendant:
Steven D'Agata , John Doe 1-3 , John Doe 4-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Martinez
Cross_claimant:
Steven D'Agata and John Doe 1-3
Cross_defendant:
John Doe 4-7 and John Doe 8-12
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
OKPOR v. RYKER et al
as 1:2012cv01319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OKPOR
Defendant:
DALE A. RYKER, BERLIN FARMERS MARKET, HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENNINGS v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2011cv00972
Defendant:
DR. KATHRYN BEACHE, DDS, CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR AUGUST-OCTOBER, 2009, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
