Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Hare v. Town of Mt. Kisco et al
as 1:2014cv05546
Plaintiff:
Thomas O. O'Hare
Defendant:
Town of Mt. Kisco, Michael Cindrich, Mark Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DONAHUE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2014cv03567
Plaintiff:
JOHN DONAHUE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Putzer v. Beckman et al
as 2:2013cv01120
Defendant:
Andrea S Beckman, Susan Brager, Larry Brown and others
Plaintiff:
David Saul Putzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putzer v. Attal., et al.,
as 2:2013cv00165
Defendant:
Shmuel Attal, Susan Brager, Larry Brown and others
Plaintiff:
David Saul Putzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Las Vegas, Nevada, Co. Clark et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Defendant:
8th Judicial District Court, L.C. Adams, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremias v. Donahue et al
as 2:2012cv01266
Defendant:
Atkinson, John Donahue, Horschmann and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph S. Jeremias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Donahue v. Legal Recovery Law Offices et al
as 3:2011cv01891
Plaintiff:
John Donahue
Defendant:
Legal Recovery Law Offices and Mark D. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BRETT v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2010cv03797
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
JOHN DONAHUE, PAUL DONAHUE and LAURA GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
