Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gage et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01989
Plaintiff:
John Gage and Naomi Gage
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Gage v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 12-30803
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHN GAGE
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Gage v. Cain
as 2:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Gage
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leal v. American Federation of Government Employees et al
as 3:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Richard Leal
Defendant:
American Federation of Government Employees , John Gage and Vicki Loyall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burton v. American Federation of Governmant Employees et al
as 1:2011cv01416
Defendant:
American Federation of Governmant Employees, John Gage, Ena Judd and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aldrich et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2009cv04274
Plaintiff:
William Aldrich, Randy Clanton, Attila Csenterics and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. John Gage
as 09-1808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN GAGE, National President, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, JOE FLYNN, National Vice President and others
Wilder v. Gage et al
as 1:2009cv01786
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Defendant:
John Gage, American Federation of Government Employees, Joe Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
PERSOW v. GAGE et al
as 1:2009cv01216
Plaintiff:
MEYER J. PERSOW
Defendant:
JOHN GAGE, JOHN GAGE, JOHN GAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
OSEKRE v. GAGE
as 1:2009cv01194
Plaintiff:
ADJELEY OSEKRE
Defendant:
JOHN GAGE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
