Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kaufman v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
John Kaufman
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, Annette Chamber Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Wilson v. MMC East, LLC et. al.
as 2:2021cv06074
Plaintiff:
Emily Wilson
Defendant:
MMC East, LLC d/b/a/ Porsche Huntington, Brian Miller, John Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cook v. MMC East, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05717
Defendant:
John Kaufman, Brian Miller, MMC East, LLC doing business as Porsche Huntington and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Cook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Crisp et al v. Palmer et al
as 1:2020cv00322
Plaintiff:
Ryan Greene, Ricardo Dockery, Robert Tyndell and others
Defendant:
County of Cherokee, North Carolina and Derrick Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Ryannel Isiah Braxton
Defendant:
Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky, J.J. Scarbrough and John Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ryannel Isiah Braxton
Defendant:
Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky, J.J. Scarbrough and John Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv07770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kaufman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02663
Plaintiff:
Myra Kaufman and John Kaufman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carney v. Kaufman
as 2:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carney
Defendant:
B John Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
