Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
James El v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
John Marshall, Bonita R Comer, Michael L. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler, CPT Camacho, Allen Beard and others
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Underwood v. United States District of Kentucky
as 0:2021cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Copenhaver et al
as 2:2020cv00727
Defendant:
C.I. Kristina N. Sheldon, Sergeant Trivia Divita, Jennifer Rada Herrald and others
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldstein v. Marshall et al
as 3:2018cv00612
Defendant:
Terrance McCulliffee, John Marshall, Shannon Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
David Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldstein v. Trammell et al
as 8:2018cv02429
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Henrico County Chief Police, Officer D. Trammell and others
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Marshall et al
as 8:2018cv02461
Defendant:
Judge John Marshall, Dept of Public Safety VA, Shannon Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Marshall
as 8:2018cv02092
Defendant:
Judge John Marshall
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Marshall et al
as 8:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Defendant:
John Marshall and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
